Critical review of the patient's rapid response to the team policies Essay

faultfinding review of the patients fast response to the team policies of capital of Saudi Arabia Military hospital - Essay Example5 b.1 Early Signs of tolerant deadening .. 5 b.2 Strategy Used in Activating the Rapid receipt Time and Time Spent to Activate Response .. 8 b.3 Time taken to Transfer Patients from protect to ICU and Emergency Cases wherein the Hospital has No Available Bed . 9 b.5 Application of the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendations) when Treating Acute Patients 10 b.6 Clinical Issue related to DNR (do not resuscitate) in case the Patient is Suffering from Physical Deterioration ... 12 III. Conclusion and Recommendations ... 13 References . 17 Appendix I Summary of Signs and Symptoms wherein the Rapid Response team up should be Deployed ........................................................................................ 22 Introduction To avoid a sudden cardiac arrest or death, health commission professionals should not delay the provision of life support and other related health c ar inevitably of the patients (Williams et al. 2011 Hillman et al. 2005). Published back in 2007 in an article entitled Safer Care for the Acutely Ill Patient, the National Patient Safety Agency (2007) reported that 576 out of the 1,804 hospital deaths were due to diagnostic errors, unrecognised patient deterioration that were left untreated, and problems with resuscitation after a sudden cardiac arrest. Based on the or so recent accident and arrest report coming from the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) in England, the number of patients admitted for accident and touch between April 2009 to March 2010 was 15.6 million (NHS 2011). In Scotland alone, the NHS reported that the number of admitted patients who were given accident and emergency run last December 2011 was 129,100 (NHS 2012). As a common knowledge, accident and emergency cases includes not only life-threatening scenarios but also some minor injuries which could be easily treated by the health care professionals. Because of the daily inflows of emergency cases received by each of the local hospitals each day, the standard wait date in UK before the patient could receive health care intervention was 4 hours (NHS 2012). Considering the average waiting hours before each patient could receive health care intervention, this study will focus on discussing clinical strategies used in UK and Riyadh Military Hospital (RMH) to ensure that its health care professionals are able to deliver quality care and treatment to each patient on a incidentally basis. In relation to the significance of rapid response team in saving the lives of the patients who were admitted in emergency department, this study will compare and contrast the rapid response team policies for acute patients in UK and the Riyadh Military Hospital. Established on December 1978, Riyadh Military Hospital (RMH) also known as the Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital is a tertiary healthcare fac ility in Riyadh urban center in Saudi Arabia (RMH 2012). To enable the readers gain better understanding with regards to the effectiveness and differences between the ICU rapid response team in both countries, this report will first discuss the main purpose of rapid response team. As part of critically reviewing the effectiveness of