A Comparison of the Villains of A Dolls House and Madame Bovary :: comparison compare contrast essays

Similarities in the Villains of A Dolls House and Madame Bovary   Bibliography w/2 sources Krogstad and Lheureux are two literary villains created by Henrik Ibsen and Gustave Flaubert respectively. Between them, they share m each kindredities. They both are exploiting the main piece of the novels they are in. They both want something, which was at least at whizz point bills. They both seem cold and heartless, remorseless, though nice at one point in time. When are also alike in that when they want something, they will resort to vicious means of acquiring it. They subsist the secrets in which both novels plots are based. The list of similarities is significant as any one can see, but can they really be named "similar"? Perhaps they have some in common, but are the characters rattling alike? It would seem to me that they are actually very different. It can be argues either way, but the correct answer to this question can notwithstanding come though examinati on. Weighing both the likenesses and similarities will rule start either extreme in likeness, but perhaps they fall into a category close to one side. In this essay I remember to cut through the protective fibers set by Flaubert and Ibsen, and to examine the content of two important characters, to compare them, and to contrast. Both Lheureux and Krogstad want something. At commencement they both want money, which is a large similarity. Soon Krogstad changes his demand to charge his job, and Lheureux just lets the debts owed to him by Emma Bovary build up. They both seem nice at one point in each work. Lheureux begins on a ripe(p) note, being very kind to Emma and her husband. He extends a lot of attribute to Emma, which she abuses, and unwittingly plans her own demise. Krogstad on the other hand begins with a money grubbing attitude, though not quite as ruthless as that of Lheureux. Krogstads finally progresses through the play, when at the end he is actually a becoming ind ividual. It would seem that as far as character progression goes, the two are inverse of each other. They both use threats to gain what they want. In Lheureuxs case, he threatens to tell her husband, and later foreclosure if she doesnt pay. She managed to put Lheureux off for a while. in the end he lost patience...Hed be forced to take back the things he had brought her.