Desparate air Essay

Nash and CEO from Seglin hold want to protect their companies, their mployees, their shareholders and their own income. In the case of RDCAR, first mannequin is re perception raising honorable awareness is something that Desperate Air slew can implement in their organization. However, DAC have audit d oneness on the property for cut-rate sale sixer months ago and there was no wild flags. Mr. Nash did reached out to natural lawyers of his firm who advised him that there is nonhing in Florida law that states requirement of disclo certain(predicate) of risky substances on commercial property.It is safe to pronounce he did little bit of a discovery to make sure he is not breaking the law. It sounds to me like he did discovery peg in business law rather than business ethics. Something that law says it is chastise thing to do, it might not always be ethically compensate ending. Also, German philosopher Emmanuel Kant states Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by th y will a universal law of nature. And what if every theatre director and every person acted like Mr. Nash, what would this world be like?Would everyone middling think of themselves and their closest surroundings and the world would become a poisonous place of living where no one Mr. Nash went through entire cognition mannikin mentioned in RDCAR model. He hasnt read all of the information papers about ethical decisions in different business smears. I feel that by Mr. Williamss rushed suggestion to close the sale without fully evaluating the decision of his VP of Real Estate, DAC doesnt care too overmuch about cognition anyways. This might have influenced Mr.Nashs decision as hale, while not having enough time to evaluate entire situation and learn the perception. both Mr. Nash and CEO decision was base on piddling term profit decision. I dont believe that the great unwashed that will be living in the future retirements home cover the drumhead of Mr. Nash, same as lives of passengers havent crossed the mind of the CEO. He hasnt thought about elders getting possible diseases and illnesses from hazardous materials at the property, as well as anyone else who spends time with them as well as workers of the new retirement home.If we look at the bigger hear what is the best for the society we have to look at Consequentialist Theory. Authors Trevino and Nelson of the textbook Managing line of reasoning Ethics, would say that Mr. Nash didnt choose ethically worsen decision based on consequentialist theory. The book states the best ethical decision is the one that yields the greatest force out benefits for society, and the worst decision is the one that yields the greatest net harm for society.DAC might not get in hold out because most likely information about hazardous materials will not leak to Fledgling industries or the press, same as in the member How to Make Tough Ethical Calls by Jeffrey Seglin, the word about failed railway locomotive parts might not reach the press. If Fledgling finds out afterward the sale, there is a possibility of a lawsuit where DAC can definitely loose and unethical managers will definitely bring this firm o bankruptcy. I dont think that Mr. Nash is proud by his actions of decision the sale and not disclosing information about the property.In the Action phase of RDCAR, organization is supposed to recognize ethical achievements and negative unethical behaviors. Both Mr. Nash and CEO from the article How to Make Tough Ethical Calls made correct decision by business law but not ethically correct decision for the greater good. Mr. Nash might have asked himself some of the six questions that Michael Rion says in his book, The Responsible Manager Practical Strategies for Ethical Decision devising also mentioned in the Seglins article Why is this bothering me? Who else matters? Am I being true to myself? Mr.Nash knows that this wasnt a correct decision since he was bothered by it and also consulted his w ife and prayed. The questions also include What do others think which is also referred in Treveno/ Nelson textbook what would readers of New York Times think. They wouldnt agree with Mr. Nashs decision in my opinion. As in the terminal phase of RDCAR, Reflection readers of New York Times would think that it seems as a lot of managers and CEOs ould make a good decision for their company and employees which is based on short term profits, but rarely correct ethical decision while considering everyone else that might be influenced.This is why I would separate the information about jeopardyous materials if I was in Mr. Nashs situation. I couldnt live with the fact that I was putting in danger lives of anyone that would be exposed to the radioactive materials. Also, I wouldnt want to disappoint all of the current and future customers of Desperate Air Corporation. Even though Desperate Air is really desperate to make comeback and meliorate their financials, ethically correct decision would be to References Dunfee et al.